All the cool kids on the SF booktube, Media Death Cult, I watch have been
reading Alastair Reynolds books, so when I found one at a local
charity shop, I picked it up. It happened to be Pushing Ice, one of
his stand alone books. Below is my review of that book. Unlike
Reynolds’ book, I won’t spoil the review in this prologue.
Pushing Ice
By Alastair Reynolds
The reviewer’s
bias: I prefer stories with well developed, pleasant characters. I
like writing that is clever and witty – entertaining in itself. I
prefer first person narratives, or close third person narratives. I
dislike thinly disguised fanfic or stories with gaping plot holes.
Pushing Ice
begins with a prologue set 18,000+ years in the future – a future
with thousands of human inhabited planets. A politician wants to
honor the “Benefactor and her people” are who are “still out
there and moving away from us,” far away, but less than 18,000
light years away. The Benefactor is Bella Lind.
The first chapter
then introduces us to comet ice mining rocketship Rockhopper, the actual story set,
according to the back cover blurb, in the year 2057. I am always amazed at the
optimism of science fiction writers. To have nuclear powered space
ships pushing around comets 52 years from the date Reynolds wrote
this book is pretty damn optimistic.
The Rockhopper is
captained by Bella Lind, the eventual Benefactor. As the story opens, a minor
moon of of Saturn proves to have been an alien artifact by breaking
free of its orbit and heading out of the solar system. Captain Lind’s
Rockhopper is the only (non-Chinese) ship in position to intercept
and investigate the artifact for the few days they would have before having to turn back, and only if they push their
ship hard. They are tasked with the mission and agree to head out to
intercept the artifact.
The prologue basically tells
the reader that they succeed in intercepting and gathering enough data to
eventual create an interstellar human society. And it also tells us
that the Rockhopper never returns to the solar system, since it is still
moving away, 18,000 years later. So the reader knows “who did it,” leaving the story to tell the “how.”
Foreshadowing is once again used several chapters in. He begins a section with the line:
“No death in a spacesuit is ever good, but Mike Takahashi’s was
especially bad.” And proceeds to spend the next 13 pages
describing the failed rescue attempt in great detail.
Since the reader
already knows that the Rockhopper will not return to the solar
system, as planned, the only question is what goes amiss? As it turns
out, there is an onboard accident that suggests that the fuel tanks have less fuel than
what they should have according to ship sensors. How did this happen? It is suggested that
the numbers were tampered with by the ship’s owners back on Earth
via a software upgrade or bug fix. I can’t say for certain if this
is the cause, since I did not get much farther in the book. I found that I couldn't believe this, and gave up around
page 125 out of 780 pages. This may've been a red herring, but it doesn't matter, they don't return.
So why the DNF? I
like character driven stories with at least a few pleasant
characters. Reynolds introduces what seems like several dozen
characters in the first couple of chapters in a shotgun spray of conversations laced with dense techno-minutia details and fragmented backstories. My wife will write down names of characters in books to
keep them straight, but I’m not one to do that. When there
are too many characters tossed at me at once, willy-nilly, I just don't care about any of them. They all tend to fall under the category devices designed to provide background info and world building rather than people.
Basically, they’re interchangeable, and while they may become more
distinct later on, I’m still not likely to care about them. And this criticisms includes our main protagonist, the Benefactor, Captain Bella Lind.
While Bella is
presented sympathetically, I felt that she was not in the story enough at this point to anchor the
narrative. First, she’s in and out of it, with all the other bit
players speaking their parts, often on tangents (at least in the
first hundred twenty plus pages of the story). Secondly, Reynolds has her do
something that doesn’t seem in character, no doubt in order to set
up a conflict. After that accident aboard ship, on day 11, Chapter 4,
Bella’s best friend aboard the ship is the person who discovers the apparent
discrepancy between what the fuel data says now and what it said
before it was altered. Bella doesn’t entirely believe her and
contacts the managers of the mission on Earth regarding the discrepancy –
who, of course, deny it is possible, and suggest that the person
reporting it has gone off the deep end. To check on it herself, she
and the corporate guy who is second in command, go down to the
section of the ship to collect this data themselves – while Bella’s
best friend is sleeping. As the captain of the ship, there is no
reason why they needed to do this behind her back. The captain would have
every right to investigate the issue herself when her friend was on
duty. Indeed, you would expect a captain to do just that. The only reason for witting this scene this way was to set up a conflict. This was the part that sent my book flying, if not across the
room and into the wall, but across the table next to me. I found that
I couldn’t like any of these people and didn’t care what happened
to them.
Reynolds is an astro-physicist who writes like one. His writing is
very dense. It is nondescript in the sense that it doesn’t get in
the way of the story, save that all the techno-minutia and snippets of dialog between lots of characters make for slow going. He is very interested in both tech and big sweeping ideas. He seems to use people as talking points, like many classic SF writers did. Now on one hand, all this techno-info may serve to
build his world, but on the other, because the characters are pretty
nondescript at this point, I found myself thinking “Who cares?" get on with the story." To that end, I found myself constantly skim reading. In short, it’s
slow, heavy, unengaging reading for a reader like me. Your mileage, will, of
course, vary.
So, to sum it up for
me – I felt that Reynolds' use of foreshadowing diminished not
only the suspense of the story, but my desire to push on, knowing how it ultimately ends. "Mind blowing" ideas and revelations are not my cup of tea, I simply didn't care what they will find on the artifact. There were no characters that I
liked. I felt that he was setting up a lot of conflict within the
crew which would make unpleasant reading for a reader like me. I didn’t believe
for a minute that the managers on Earth could add 16% more fuel to the
ship's log without someone onboard
noting the change in readings. Not to mention that fact that the people on
Earth could ruthlessly send the ship and
people on a mission that they knew was a suicide one. In short, a lot
of unpleasantness.
Goodbye, Alastair Reynolds, it’s on to D E Stevenson’s The Two Mrs.
Abotts.