The Strangest Thing...

 

I was scrolling through my YouTube feed when I came across the video on the center left of the screen shot above. It proved to be an "album" of piano pieces by a Japanese composer/pianist, Yuriko Nakamura. Some music on YouTube Music also appears on You Tube channels and vise vera, and this is an example of that; a song with just a static version of the cover. I clicked on the video and found this;

The only reason I believe it appeared on my feed, was that I had been listening to some eastern music during my morning writing session on YouTube music. Which just goes to show you how much "they"  know about you and what you're up to, at least on the web.

And from there I went to the home page of the musician, and found this;

So why the curiosity?

It was the fact that the cover art for this collection of piano pieces is one of my paintings. Indeed the two covers on the left of the home page above are both my paintings. One is Upland Road in Winter which you can find HERE. The second one, Woods Along the Harniss Road you can view HERE.

Let me tell you, it is very strange experience to find your work as an the cover art of a Japanese new age-ish musician while scrolling through videos on YouTube. And rather cool as well.

The paintings were likely found on and downloaded from my DeviantArt gallery. It's a place where a lot of people go looking for art they can use. I don't watermark my paintings, and have no problem with people downloading them for their own use and enjoyment.

While I release all my work under a Creative Commons License, that license does require that if used, I be credited as the artist, and that it should not be used for commercial purposes without my permission. And since I was neither credited, nor was my permission sought to use it, and these videos and songs are commercial ventures for the benefit of, I presume, Yuriko, the use of my art is clearly not in accordance to the CC license. Hmmm...

Looking into the matter further, it appears that the music, along with the cover art, was uploaded to YouTube by Distrokid, a company that operates something like D2D, in that musicians use it to upload their work to music apps like YouTube and Spotify, whose Yuriko Nakamura page on Spotify is below also has my artwork for those albums.

From what I could find on the Distrokid site, the person uploading the music would also need to provide the cover art just like self-publishing authors do. Now I don't know who uploaded this music, whether it was Yuriko herself, or someone else, but in any event, I doubt I would have any easy way to reach out to them and at least request credit as the artist.

I suppose there could be some remedy for this, I could file a complaint with YouTube or some such thing, but I have no interest in pursuing anything like that. Why bother? Its use costs me nothing, and displays my work. Besides, I'm rather flattered that someone would choose my art for their album cover. Though I don't know exactly why they chose those particular ones, since I didn't see any title the paintings would apply to.

Besides, I am perfectly aware, and have been from the very beginning, that if you convert your analog work to digital and upload it to the internet, you have conceded control of it. Its use is out of your control, and there is no point losing sleep over that fact. I suppose, if you are trying to make money from your work, you might be tempted to try to find and put out all the little fires of piracy sites, but it is largely a futile effort. You'd best just look on it as free advertising.

So there you go, an illustration of how connected we are. Weirdly connected.

Strangely enough, I just used the Harniss Road piece for a recent posting myself.

The Saturday Morning Post (no. 115) SUNDAY EXTRA!

 

In this week's Extra! edition we return to a series for which I've reviewed three books already for one last adventure, though it happens to be the second book in the series....

My reviewer criteria. I like light, entertaining novels. I like smaller scale stories rather than epics. I like character focused novels featuring pleasant characters, with a minimum number of unpleasant ones. I greatly value clever and witty writing. I like first person, or close third person narratives. I dislike a lot of "head jumping" between POVs and flashbacks. I want a story, not a puzzle. While I am not opposed to violence, I dislike gore for the sake of gore. I find long and elaborate fight, action, and battle sequences tedious. Plot holes and things that happen for the convenience of the author annoy me. And I fear I'm a born critic in that I don't mind pointing out what I don't like in a story. However, I lay no claim to be the final arbitrator of style and taste, you need to decide for yourself what you like or dislike in a book.

Your opinions are always welcome. Comment below. 

The Body at the Tower by Y S Lee  B

As I mentioned in the lede, this is the second book in The Agency series, AKA a Mary Quinn Mystery. I've read the other three already, and reviewed them here, with their grades, book 1.(B) Book 3,(C+) and Book 4 (C) I have been getting these books from the library, and this book had, for some reason, a much longer waiting list, so it only became available three months after the others, and I didn't care to wait for it, so I read ahead.

I describe the first book, and subsequent books as rather over the top penny dreadfuls, but with an authentic flavor, being written by a scholar of the Victorian Era. They are also marketed as YA books, with a young, 18 year old heroine. 

The premise of these books is that "The Agency" is a private detective agency being run by two women who also run a school for orphan girls, training them to make a living in the male dominated Victorian Era. The best and brightest are offered the chance to become detectives, on the theory that women in that era were more or less invisible, and could investigate things without attracting attention.

This installment is perhaps the most down to earth one of the series, though the crime Mary Quinn is asked to solve involves a dead worker, and possible embezzlement or theft of building supplies, involving the building of what we usually just call "Big Ben", the clock tower of the Parliament Building. To investigate the questions surrounding the death of the worker from a fall from the tower during the night, Mary dresses up like a young boy and is hired as a helper to the bricklayers, who are clearly up to no good. Her romantic lead from book one returns from India, ill from the effects of malaria, and is hired to inspect the working of the construction on the tower for the inquest. Together, in an uneasy alliance, they begin to solve the case, along with a somewhat shady journalist, who shows up in later books as well. 

The writing is fine, the highlight is a fairly well rendered Victorian London, and some thrills and chills, without being quite so over the top as in the other books of this series. Considered as YA books, they are probably a better read for that market than for me, who doesn't read YA, except by carelessness, as in this case. Still, I don't regret my time with them.

The Saturday Morning Post (No. 114)

 

A work of historical fiction this time around, one that comes highly recommended by a number of fantasy booktubers.

My reviewer criteria. I like light, entertaining novels. I like smaller scale stories rather than epics. I like character focused novels featuring pleasant characters, with a minimum number of unpleasant ones. I greatly value clever and witty writing. I like first person, or close third person narratives. I dislike a lot of "head jumping" between POVs and flashbacks. I want a story, not a puzzle. While I am not opposed to violence, I dislike gore for the sake of gore. I find long and elaborate fight, action, and battle sequences tedious. Plot holes and things that happen for the convenience of the author annoy me. And I fear I'm a born critic in that I don't mind pointing out what I don't like in a story. However, I lay no claim to be the final arbitrator of style and taste, you need to decide for yourself what you like or dislike in a book.

Your opinions are always welcome. Comment below.

The Last Kingdom by Bernard Cronwell   B-

The Last Kingdom is a story about the youth of Conan the Barbarian, that is to say, Uhtred, son of Uhtred. Rather than a sword and sorcery story, it is a historical novel set in 9th century England when England was being invaded, occupied, and partially subjugated by the Danes, often called the Vikings. That said, Uhtred and Conan seem to have very much in common as fictional characters.

The story is told by Uhtred, son of Uhtred from the vantage point of his old age. It begins when he is 10 years old, the second son of an English nobleman of the north of England. Three Danish ships are spotted and his father, Uhtred, sends his eldest son, Uhtred, son of Uhtred, to spy on them. This sone does something foolish, gets himself killed, so our narrator is given his dead elder brother's name, Uhtred, son of Uhtred, as was custom. His father is then called to raise a force to fight the invading Danes and he takes Uhtred et. al. along, though he's only a boy of 10. They lose that battle. His father is killed. However, Uhtred, seeing the Dane leader who brought his brother's head back to taunt the elder Uhtred,  attacks him with his little sword. This amuses the Dane, Ragnar, who then takes him prisoner and raises him much like a son.

Uhtred finds life as a Dane appealing. He wants to be a warrior, and warriors the Danes are. Over the course of the next six years, he becomes a Dane, and a third son to Ragnar, and serves the Danes in their wars against the English, though in his heart he still believes himself an Englishman. And, as the heir of of a noble, he hopes to regain his rightful place in England.

Telling the story from the view point of Uhtred in his old age, allows Cornwell to prove a historical perspective to the events and people the young Uhtred meets in the ten years this book covers, something he could not do if written from the young Uhtred's point of view. And it is very clear that he wants to write a history of these times and uses the eyes and memory of Uhtred to do so. Uhtred's story is a vehicle for telling the history of the time. He is given various adventures that serve to move him about the land so as to view the history and people Cordwell wishes to write about. As such, less attention is paid to him as a character, though Cornwell does try to give him some depth, such as his dual loyalties to this Danish foster-family and his claims to be an English noble, who's land had been usurped by his uncle. Still, his character comes across as somewhat shallow. He's merely a warrior very much in the mold of Conan; a simple barbarian who loves to fight, rape, and murder like the Danes he was raised by.

This is a finely written book that moves along at a nice pace, which earns it is B grade. It has a lot of history to tell of the period when Alfred the Great ruled southern England, and resisted the Danish invaders. Cornwell went on to write 12 more Uhtred novels in this series known variously as the Saxton Chronicles, the Warrior Chronicles, or The Last Kingdom, from the TV series that adopted 10 of the books. 

That said, I have no desire to read more of them. Perhaps, if I had seen the TV show, I might have a different opinion. Or not. As I have implied, Uhtred, as a character, is very much a clone of Conan the Barbarian; someone who loves battle and killing his enemies. Other than his love of battle, and scheming, there's not a lot to like about him, for my taste. 

There are a number of battle scenes in the book, which, as I have often mentioned, I just skip over, as I can't picture them - making them a waste of my time. Plus, I'm not a fan of old men telling stories of their youth, tossing in hints of what's to come. Which is to say, I'm not a fan of foreshadowing. These negative factors are which earns it its " - " grade. However, I recognize that all of these things I don't like, are things a lot of readers love, so if you are one of them, give this book a try, knowing that if you love it, you have a dozen other books to read with Uhtred. You won't have to leave the 9th century anytime soon.

Books I've Read So Far In 2025

With half of the year having slipped by, I thought I would talk a little bit - without too many spoilers for upcoming Saturday Morning Post reviews - about what I've read this year so far.

At the time of this posting, I started 40 books so far in 2025. I did not finish 8 of those, so I read 32 books as of now. Last year I read in total 48 books, so I'm reading at a slightly faster pace than last year. I am also ahead in the number of books I DNFed, since the total for all of 2024 was 5 and I'm already at 8 only half way into the year. There is a simple explanation for the jump in DNFs that I'll touch on in a minute.

First the books I read. Below is the list of the books I've reviewed to date The first number in the listing is the Saturday Morning Post number of the review. I still have 15 more Saturday Morning posts written for the rest of the books I've read, or attempted to read. Clearly, I'm going to have to start releasing "Extras!" posts again, since I'm now nearly four months behind my reading in posting my reviews. I like a backlog, but I don't need four months worth.

Below is a list of the books which I've read so far this year, and have posted reviews of. The most recent review is on the top. The number before the title is that Saturday Morning Post (Number)

Blog Post # Title -Author-grade

113 New York Minute Stephen Aryan C

112 An Infamous Army Georgette Heyer C

111 Convenient Marriage Georget Heyer DNF 31%

       Emma Jane Austen DNF 6%

110 Winter Journeys Audrey Driscoll B

109 What Comes of Attending Commoners Ball Elisabeth Aimee Brown DNF 55%

108 The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 7 Beth Brower A

The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol Beth Brower A

107 The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 5 Beth Brower A

The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 6 Beth Brower A

106 The Old World, Book One, By the Hands of Men Roy M Griffis C

105 The Wizard’s Butler Nathan Lowell DNF 29%

104 The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 3 Beth Brower A

The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 4 Beth Brower A

103 The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 1 Beth Brower A

The Unselected Journals of Emma M Lion Vol 2 Beth Brower A

102 John Nuclear at the Perihelion Palace Berthold Gambrel B

101 The Devil’s Cub Gerogette Heyer B

100 Brother Cadfael’s Penance B

99 Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen C+

98 The Reluctant Widow by Georgette Heyer B+

97 The Quiet Gentleman by Georgette Heyer B+

96 Friday’s Child by Georgette Heyer A

95 Mansfield Park by Jane Austen B-

94 These Old Shades by Georgette Heyer B+

93 Eye of the Needle by Ken Follett DNF (40%)

92 The Toll-Gate by Georgette Heyer B

91 Black Sheep by Georgette Heyer B+

90 The Dawning of Everything by David Graeber & David Wengrow DNF

Despite a DNF to start the year, as you can see, my reading year took off strong, even with the 4 books I DNF'ed. The list includes lots of "B"s, and then we get to those 8 Emma M Lion A books. with their "A" grades. And I enjoyed the first Georgette Heyer books as well. However, my most recent reads of her books have not fared as well going forward. 

However, like the Heyer books, all my reading has taken a turn for the mediocre. Going through the list of the upcoming reviews, I see that I have another 4 DNFs, to bring the yearly total to 8, with only 4 "B"s and no "A" books. The remaining books, 10 books in all, are "C"s of one sort or another with one movie review. In short, not a single book to write home about in the last couple of months. The saving grace of this period of book reading, was that I had gone back and reread the Emma M Lion series. Just as good, if not better, the second time around. No doubt it casts a long shadow.

Much of this downturn can be explained by the fact that I am exploring books that are out of my usual orbit of reading. This includes a number of classic authors and books, as well as some odd one-offs. For example, one book was suggested by neighbor, as well as several suggested by one or two of the booktubers I follow. And it also includes a first draft of a book by an author that I did not expect to like, but was curious anyway. There were also two books I reread that did not live up to my expectations. In short, my reading has been somewhat all over the bookish landscape, sampling this and that, mostly based on recommendations and a "What the heck" attitude. Prospecting is a risky venture. Sometime you discover gold, other times... "C"s and DNFs

I must confess I'm getting rather weary of "C" books, and fruitless quests to find new authors to read. I have a book on hold at the library from a new author recommended to me, but beyond that, I've grown rather leery of the recommendations I've been coming across on booktube. I think I'm in the mood to start pulling out some old favorites from my shelves. What's the point of having a library if not to keep the books you love, close at hand to reread again?

As a bonus feature, below is a map I came across of fictional London's St Crispian's as featured in The Uncollected Journals of Emma M Lion by Beth Brower.

Source: https://emma-m-lion.fandom.com/wiki/St._Crispian%27s

The Saturday Morning Post (No. 113)

 

Given our less than spectacular run of Regency era stories, we're off in a new direction this week with a speculative fiction novella by Stephen Aryan. Mr Aryan's YouTube channel is one of the channels I used to watch, so I know a bit about him. 

On his channel on YouTube he was "A Traditionally Published Fantasy Author." "Traditionally Published" being the operational words, as he offered advice on how to be published traditionally, and dispelled "myths" about traditional publishing being promoted by advocates of self publishing. I was a member of his author Discord server for a while, with the hope of being able to discuss writing with other writers. I discovered the Discord format wasn't for me, and dropped out after six months or so. I still get his newsletter each month, so I still follow his career. I'm not a fan of his type of fantasy, so I haven't read more than a few sample pages of his work before picking this novella up on Kindle Unlimited.

Stephen Aryan's first trilogy was published by a major publisher in 2015, it earned out and he was offered another contract for a second trilogy. That didn't do as well, and he seemed to have been not offered another contract, since he ended up selling a duology to a smallish publisher, Angry Robot. The first of those books did well enough to be offered a second contract for a trilogy. However, the second book has only 1/3 the number of ratings on Goodreads - which I use as a stand in for sales numbers, which indicates a big drop off in sales. The first book in his next trilogy has even less ratings then that second book. When the first book of a trilogy bombs, the next two books are usually DOA, and the second book did nothing to change that trajectory, nor does the third book appear likely to change that trajectory either. 

He is now without a book contract. 

It is said that 90% of the authors in traditional publishing are out of the business within 10 years, so Aryan's trajectory is, well, let's say, educational. Being without a contract, and with a track record of his books not selling particularly well...he could well be said to be out of the business within 10 years. This is not to say he's given up. He has several ongoing projects that he hopes his agent can sell, perhaps by changing genre. But in the meanwhile, he has released his first self published novella, which is what I will be talking about below. And, though he is no longer putting out new videos, he had been, in the last year, calling himself simply "A Fantasy Author", no doubt seeing the handwriting on the wall. We will have to see how he fares going forward.

As the fantasy author Mark Lawrence said in a recent blog post:

"The trajectory of most author careers is a modest boom followed by a rapid return to the day job as sales trail back down to insignificant." 

Anyway, enough of a backstory. On to the review.

My reviewer criteria. I like light, entertaining novels. I like smaller scale stories rather than epics. I like character focused novels featuring pleasant characters, with a minimum number of unpleasant ones. I greatly value clever and witty writing. I like first person, or close third person narratives. I dislike a lot of "head jumping" between POVs and flashbacks. I want a story, not a puzzle. While I am not opposed to violence, I dislike gore for the sake of gore. I find long and elaborate fight, action, and battle sequences tedious. Plot holes and things that happen for the convenience of the author annoy me. And I fear I'm a born critic in that I don't mind pointing out what I don't like in a story. However, I lay no claim to be the final arbitrator of style and taste, you need to decide for yourself what you like or dislike in a book.

Your opinions are always welcome. Comment below.

New York Minute by Stephen Aryan  C

This is a crime-noir novella set on a world settled by humans. The New York in the title is the name of the city on this new world that was meant to reproduce the Earth city of that name. But things didn't go as planned, so we have a much more primitive culture living in the remains of that high-tech, but unfinished city. The story involves an ex-cop now private eye, Cole Blackstone, who is hired by the most feared crime boss of the city, Karl Dolman - a job he dared not refuse - to locate the crime boss' missing daughter. We follow Blackstone as he, and an old pal of his, with an incurable disease, one that makes him tougher before it kills him, try to trace the whereabouts of this wayward daughter. It takes them into the meanest streets of New York. Here they meet ruthless gangs and ends in a long running fight scene with lots of action, blood, and death. It turns out the plot was pretty much one big MaGuffin.

If you are going to write a private eye noir story, it is going to be compared, in my mind at least, to the work of Raymond Chandler on the lyrical end of the spectrum and Georges Simenon on the other, cold, hard attention to detail end. There are many other writers of private eye stories, but those are the two I know and appreciate the most. They're tough acts to follow. 

Aryan is neither. Indeed, I found it somewhat surprising that, as an author of 11 traditionally published books, his writing was, while serviceable, very mundane, nondescript. There was, I felt, no real style or flair in it. None of Chandler's wit or deft descriptions. This was not too surprising, since I had read those several pages of a previous book, and felt the same way. So the bar was low going in, and while he may have reached it, he did not exceeded it. 

However, since I am big fan of style in writing, my criticisms may be ignored by many, if not most readers. The story has lots of action, if that's your cup of tea, going for it, just know that nothing in the story sets it apart from any other book in the genre.

However not only was his writing uninspired, his plot was as well.  It had all the familiar tropes; Blackstone is an ex-cop, the police are corrupt, the hookers are alluring, the streets are mean, in a medieval style, with horse drawn trollies and all the usual smells of a rotting city are cataloged. Everything in the story is, in fact a mashup of, bog-standard noir and urban fantasy settings. There is nothing really unique about this New York.

Strangely enough, he has his first person narrator spend a great deal of time explaining the whole backstory of the city, even though most of it has nothing at all to do with the story he's telling. As for the New York of the story, he uses just the names of the various locales of the real New York, which have no relationship to the real city save that it was originally meant to be a new version of it. There is really no sense of the original New York, and the use of the old locale name adds nothing to the story, save confusion. He plans to write several more stories to build out his world, so there was really no need to do all that info-dumping world-building in this one. It could've been left for later stories when that information might be more relevant. 

All told, my rather  low expectations were more or less met. I am, however, still surprised that an experienced, published author of 11 novels, should still be writing on what I consider an such an unexceptional level*. As always, I grade books more or less on how much I enjoy them. This book wasn't my cup of tea. It may be for you. Kindle Unlimited readers can read if for free and see what they think. It's short enough to read in a day.

*Since reading this story, I've read the beta version of a best selling self-published sf/fantasy author's newest novel, and I was no more impressed with his writing. Indeed, I didn't even bother to finish it it was so sparse and elements of the story so unbelievable. I guess for most readers of genre fiction, story does indeed trump writing. They don't think about the underpinnings, or the lack there of. Being a writer myself, I do. I'll talk about that story in a couple of months...

(Some More) Thoughts On AI

Art Flitter, human foreman of Warehouse 73B, after three years at his desk without having to do anything, began to suspect that the small sealed gift box included in his ‘Welcome to Warehouse 73B’ information packet handed to him on his first day on the job, with a note stuck on it saying, ‘Do not open for 30 years,' likely contained an inscribed gold watch thanking him for his 30 years of service and wishing him well in his retirement.

I swear, I thought that I'd never written a piece on AI before. I did know, however, that I had posted something using the robot/AI cartoons like the one above, so I searched down through my posts to see what I'd done, only to discover that I had, indeed, written a post about AI in July 2023. Rereading my 2023 piece, it seems like I've not changed my mind much, if at all. So this post covers much of the same ground as the previous one. But it also has a few different points as well. And having already spent several hours writing it, up it goes...

I recently watch a video on YouTube where an author, as a proof of concept, went through the entire process of creating an entire science fiction novel from scratch using AI. He had the AI generate the story idea then write the story, scene by scene. While it took an elaborate process with various checks and balances, and using several pro-level AIs, with some human proofreading to check for continuity, since the scenes were produced independently, the story it produced was good enough to be published, a big improvement from his results a year before. 

So clearly, AI generated novels are possible, and will only get better. And a tidal wave of them is likely on the way. I think most readers will never notice the difference. Commercially successful books in genre fiction are usually, with a few exceptions, not great art. Good enough is all that is necessary to please most people. AI will soon become good enough.

Should writers be at all concerned? I don't think so. For most of us it will simply be business as usual. For one simple reason. Books sell largely on the basis of how many readers become aware of them. Quality may matter, but they have to come across them before quality first begins to matter. It doesn't really matter how good, or not, the AI novels will become, since, the market is already very over saturated. Even now, we're talking about 30,000 to 50,000 books released every month in the most popular genres on Amazon. 

For the commercially successful writers, they too need not worry. If you can beat those odds, well, there's little different between too many books, and too too many books. They've already figured out how to deal with an over saturated market. Whatever works for best selling authors now will work just as well against ten or more times those numbers because they know how to reach their readers. Unless the generators of AI written books know their secret, all those books they turn out will never be seen, and thus never be sold. In short, AI publishers will still face the almost insurmountable odds of making a worthwhile amount of money as any independent publisher. And good luck with that.

When looking at the broader picture, I have no doubts many jobs are going to be eliminated by AI. Just Google a photograph taken in a factory at the turn of the last century and compare it to any one of today's factories. You will see that machines have all but replaced humans in manufacturing, arguably to our benefit.

Is art different or more important, than producing cars or toasters? Your call. Clearly however, capitalist don't see a difference. They see that creating all sorts of art will be more cost efficient and require smaller HR departments. It is simply a question of time, as they now have the machines needed to replace this set of human workers. This is what machines, and capitalists, have always done. And have done for centuries. 

Nevertheless, we're told that machines can never truly create art. That AI will never replace human artists because, well to put in a simple phrase, AIs don't have souls, and all the attributes assigned to having one. If they can't replace human artists, why such outrage, such angst?

I don't think the discussion is really about art and creativity at all, even if they make it sound like it is. AIs are not a threat to any sort of art, as art

Let's be cynical realistic here; it's because AI threatens artists' incomes. This discussion, this angst, is not about art. It's about money. Art as a job. Anyone who doesn't need money to motivate them to create art can still be creative. AI doesn't effect making art at all. It affects making money from making art. 

The real issue is that many commercial artists will have to get new jobs. 

Now, looking for work sucks. I know this from experience. But it is also part of most everyone's life. So there's nothing new here. Artists can still do their art. All that may be changing in the coming decade is the opportunity to profit financially from doing their art.

And, well, we all know that money is the root of all evil, so one can make the case that AI is here to save artists from evil. Or at least compromised art for the sake of popular taste and commercial viability.

Also, on the positive side, many of these commercial writers and artists are, or soon will be using, AI as a tool to supplement and streamline their workflow and become more productive, while still being considered human artists. Good AI, not evil AI.

Bottom line for authors is that AI won't starve writers. The industry has been quite adept at starving them for centuries. Writers, and most other artists, are used to little pay for their creativity. Most of them already have to have, you know, real jobs, to make money. AI is going to eliminate jobs that produce art, which is sad, but that doesn't mean AI is eliminating art. It's just eliminating jobs. And, maybe, dreams.

Like it or not, replacing humans with machines pretty much defines capitalism and the march of progress. Arguably, it has made the lot of humans better. Will it continue to do so? Stay tuned.

Disclaimer

I use free Google Docs, Grammarly, and Scribbr online grammar tools to proofread my manuscript for typos, wrong words, and comma placement, to the benefit of my readers.

I use Google, Apple, and Amazon auto-generated narration for my audiobooks, giving my readers more options.

I don't use any Ai tools in either my writing or art. I do use the old school spell checker for my manuscripts and photo retouching tools in Gimp for my art - all aids that have been around for several decades.

The Darval-Mers Dossier -E book FREE on Amazon

 

I just noticed that Amazon, all on its own, has slashed the $2.99 ebook price of The Darval-Mers Dossier to $0.00 price matching all the other ebook stores. I don't how long this sale will last, but get it while you can!

The Darval-Mers Dossier on Amazon can be found HERE